Background Image
Previous Page  46 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

46

3. The Success Factors

The initiatives in this roadmap will enable

the HK3030 Campaign if the following

conditions are met.

A Central Coordinating Authority

One of the features we identified in

our review is the presence of a central

coordinating authority in almost all the cities

with comprehensive green building plans:

the BCA of Singapore, the OLTPS as part of

the New York City Mayor’s Office, and to a

certain extent the Mayor of London’s Office

and the Greater London Assembly. Such an

authority has the responsibility of:

• Taking a leadership role in the

transformation in aligning all the

stakeholders

• Setting an overall target

• Serving as a benchmarking authority

• Coordinating,

implementing

and

policing the policies and regulatory

measures

• Acting as a driver for research and

dissemination of the results

A Robust Benchmarking Framework

As we pointed out repeatedly throughout

the roadmap, the key step in enacting the

roadmap is the establishment of a robust

benchmarking framework that:

• Allows consistent, meaningful and

quantifiable comparison of our building

stock;

• Is sufficiently flexible to encompass a

significant portion of our building stock

(at least 70% in the particular scenario

chosen for illustration in the executive

summary);

• With outputs that can serve as regulatory

metrics in the BEC and EAC; and

• Administered by an authority that can

effectively “police” the process.

A Strengthened Regulatory Framework

A particular feature of the scenario described

in this roadmap is that it is predominantly

regulatory driven. This of course requires

strengthening of the various regulatory

tools as described in the earlier sections

with the following critical features:

• They have to be upgraded according

to a time-tabled schedule to achieve

the desired end-result by 2030 (35%

performance enhancement over 2012

minimum performance);

• The captive building stock has to be

sufficiently large (for the example of

the illustrative scenario described in the

executive summary – at least 70% of the

existing commercial building stock); and

• Gradual shift towards a performance

based approach that can accurately and

meaningfully quantify the actual energy

consumption of a building.

A Business Case for Retrofitting

To enable the large-scale, self-sustaining

improvement to energy efficiency of

the existing building stock required in

the scenario discussed in the executive

summary, the retrofitting must make good

financial sense. This in turn requires:

• A robust benchmarking framework to

quantify the savings;

• The gradual enhancement of minimum

regulatory performance to drive the

market towards more efficient products;

• The availability of technology and

expertise – a result of intentional

research and training; and

• Creation of viable energy markets

through credits, rebates or taxes.